A bid-decision practice, not a marketing agency

Contracting Authority reads federal solicitations and tells small firms which ones they can win. Not how to market. Not how to network. Which specific opportunity is winnable, on what evidence, and what it will cost to be wrong.

Most of what is sold into this market is education — a course, a template pack, a lead list, a membership. This is not that. Every engagement here ends in a decision or a document, and the fee structure is arranged so that the decision is allowed to be no.

What we do

Three things, in the order a firm usually needs them. We assess whether a specific solicitation is winnable for you and put the verdict in writing. We position a firm so that the next solicitation is one it can answer — codes, capability statement, past performance framing. And we work a live bid alongside the people writing it, building the compliance matrix and scoring the draft the way an evaluation board will.

What we do not do is write the proposal for you. The technical approach has to come from the people who will perform the work; a response written entirely by a consultant reads like one to the board scoring it.

Who this is for

Owners of small firms going after a first federal award — most often service-disabled veteran-owned and veteran-owned businesses, registered in SAM or close to it, and not yet converting any of it into contracts.

The common factor is that you can already perform the work if you win it. Everything here is about arranging what your firm can already do so that a federal buyer can see it. None of it manufactures a capability you do not have, and none of it will make a firm ready that is not.

How we read a solicitation

The method is published rather than described, because a method you cannot inspect is a claim. Every solicitation goes through the same three gates before anything else happens.

Gate 1 — Is the door actually open
Set-aside type, size standard, certification requirements, and the registration state you have to be in on the day of award. A firm that fails Gate 1 cannot win the contract no matter how good the response is, and most of the pursuits we stop are stopped here.
Gate 2 — Were the requirements written for someone else
Salient characteristics, minimum experience thresholds, and evaluation factors built on a track record that only an incumbent has. This is the gate most firms skip, and it is the one that costs the most when it is skipped — a week of your best people, spent on a competition that was decided before it opened.
Gate 3 — Can you perform it and still make money
Limitations on subcontracting, wage determinations, payment timing, and the capacity the work actually consumes. A first federal award that loses money is a worse outcome than a no-bid.

Inside a bid, the same discipline applies to the document itself: read Section M before Section C. The evaluation criteria decide the award; the statement of work only tells you what the job is. A response that covers every word of Section C and ignores Section M is a compliant document that loses to a worse company with a better-organised volume. That read is worked through in full in the briefing on Sections L and M, and it is the first thing an opportunity assessment does to your solicitation.

No contingency. No commission. No percentage of an award. Nothing in the fee structure pays more when you bid, and nothing pays at all when you win. There is no arrangement here that rewards us for telling you to go for it.

That is not a principle, it is arithmetic. A consultant paid on contingency has to find a reason to bid, because a no-bid pays them nothing. A consultant paid a flat fee can tell you the requirement was written for the incumbent, hand you the evidence, and be finished.

Every engagement is priced so the answer can be no. The opportunity assessment is the clearest case: $1,000 for a written verdict on one solicitation, and that verdict is sometimes a no-bid. You paid $1,000 to keep a week of your best people out of an unwinnable pursuit. That is the offer working, not failing.

A number and an end. Engagements run from $250 to $3,000 a month, and every one of them names a deliverable and a date before you pay. No open hourly rate, no scope that grows quietly, no retainer that exists to keep a seat warm.

Practice
Federal bid-decision and capture consulting
Clients
Small firms pursuing a first federal award
Engagements
Fixed fee, named deliverable, named date
Area served
United States, remote

Why there is no name on this page

This practice does not publish its legal entity, registration identifiers, or principal yet. That is a deliberate choice and you are owed the reason rather than a gap where the reason should be.

A firm's identifiers are worth publishing when there is award history behind them. Ours do not have that yet. Putting a UEI and a CAGE code on a page implies a performance record to a federal reader, and we would rather say nothing than imply one that does not exist. When there are awards to attach a name to, the name goes up — with the contract numbers next to it.

What that costs you as a buyer is real, so weigh it honestly: you cannot verify us in SAM today, and you should treat any claim on this site as unverified until you can. What you can inspect is the method above, the published pricing on every service page, and the reasoning in the briefings — which is the same reasoning you would be buying. Judge it on that.

Not for you if

Not for you if you want a lead list. We assess opportunities and we source them under retainer, but nobody here emails you a spreadsheet of solicitations and calls it strategy. Not for you if you want contingency pricing or a success fee — that arrangement buys you a consultant who needs you to bid, and it is the exact incentive this practice exists to remove. Not for you if you want the proposal written for you. Not for you if you are looking for a subcontract from us, a teaming agreement, or an introduction to a prime; none of those are for sale, and asking for them is a different conversation than this one. Not for you if you are a large business, or a small business chasing a multi-volume IDIQ or GWAC on-ramp; that is a capture team's job and it is not a fixed-fee read. And not for you if you want to be told federal contracting will work for your business. Sometimes it will not, at least not this year, and we will put that in writing and invoice you for it.

Reaching us

By appointment. Written questions get an answer within one business day, Monday to Friday, through the contact form.

Hire the read, not the enthusiasm.

Sixty paid minutes on your firm, your codes, and whether federal work is worth your next twelve months. The $250 is credited against anything you book afterward.

Book a strategy call